The funding equation organisations should be using

Razor-sharp clarity is a must for good leadership

Nora Dettor
Director of Training and Communication
January 15, 2026
Share Post

Most social leaders we speak to are putting in huge effort into fundraising

They are writing proposals. Building relationships. Responding to shifting priorities. Reworking budgets again and again. And still, funding remains the biggest barrier to scale. Over the past year, funding conditions have tightened. Large aid budgets have been cut. Flexible funding is harder to secure. Expectations around proof, cost, and long-term viability have risen.

In this environment, a familiar cycle takes hold.

Funding is chased first. -> The work is reshaped to fit what is available. -> Then the chase starts again.

Over time, this takes a toll. Leaders feel exhausted. Strategy becomes harder to explain. Energy gets spread across too many fronts, with no clear path to scale. For a long time, fundraising was treated as a volume game. The underlying equation looked something like this:

Funding certainty = more applications + more conversations + more tactics

When funding felt uncertain, the response was to do more. In tighter conditions, that equation starts to break. Pushing harder no longer creates certainty. It just speeds up the cycle. What matters now is not how much funding you chase, but whether the logic behind it actually holds.

A useful pause is to stop asking, “How do we raise more money?”

And start asking two harder questions together.

1. What does it really cost to deliver our solution at scale?

2. And who would realistically choose to pay for what, over time?

Your funding model = what it costs + who pays for it

If either side stays fuzzy, cost or payers, the whole model stays fragile. Leaders keep running, and organisations stay dependent on short-term wins.

Importantly, the alternative to pushing harder is not to slow down or care less. It is to pause with intent. To name the assumptions you are already making. To test whether they still make sense. And to decide, deliberately, what you are building toward.

A clearer funding model does not solve everything. But it gives leaders something many are missing right now. A defensible story they can use with boards, funders, and teams. A way to say no without guilt. And a path based on choice, not just survival.

Razor sharp clarity is no longer a nice-to-have. It is an essential part of leadership.

Press enter to search or esc to cancel